Should we have urine screening for Welfare applicants 21360

Like a lot of folks in the United States, I have a job. I operate, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes because they see fit. To be able to get that salary, I'm required to go a urine test, which I have no problem with. And the key reason I've no problem with a drug test is really because I have nothing to hide. What I do have a problem with could be the distribution of my taxes to people who are doing drugs and never have to move a urine test.

Because I've to pass one to earn it for them, should not one have to pass a urine test to obtain a welfare check?

Please understand, I've no issue with helping people return on their feet. I actually do, on another hand, have a problem with helping someone sit on their bottom. Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to go a urine test to get a public assistance check?

A 1999 Michigan law required a pilot program of arbitrary substance abuse assessment in a minimum of three counties. Medicine assessment started at the beginning of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a selected area of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.

Each of the new candidates for that place needed to supply a urine sample to officers or give up their to any government support. Furthermore, any candidates already within the process needed to submit to random screening.

A class action lawsuit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days before routine testing. The suit charges the plan violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Two Michigan parents and a Detroit organization (The Westside Mothers) were called in the match. The business centers around addressing numerous welfare recipients and their loved ones. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan says, "The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country could be put through a search by the us government unless there's reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients may be poor, but that is not a not yet, anyway."

I have talked to numerous people personally and on forums about their feelings and those that oppose this have the same posture, that it is unconstitutional. To get supplementary information, we know you check out: socaltreatmentcenter.com/drug-detoxification-process.html. In my opinion, it appears that I am maybe not moving random drug examination onto any random person. The welfare recipient chooses to get support from the government. Therefore similar to distributing paperwork, you need to submit a urine sample. Yet another position people discuss is false positives. If you know anything at all, you will seemingly desire to read about https://rehabilitationguide.org/substance-abuse.html. Well when they maintain fake positive, then execute a hair follicle test. To study additional information, we know you check-out: https://anaheimdetox.com/2018/10/30/what-everyone-must-know-about-how-to-detox-opiates.

If urine check are unconstitutional, then discard the whole welfare system. Allow your voice be heard on Political Majority.com..

If you adored this article and you would certainly such as to get additional details pertaining to Anaheimaddictiontreatment.com/oxycontin-abuse.html kindly visit our own web site.