Google Talk 19135

I do not think that Google tries some way that is to differently control their markets than in a normally competing way. And I don't think that Google is truly super-arms military s...

I do not stick within the majority of the prevailing theories to the conspiracy of Google. I do not think either that Google gives a preference to the Web sites which announce in its plan of AdWords, or which it moves away specific sites from the first pages to stimulate them to announce.

I do not think that Google tries some way that is to differently control their markets than in a normally competitive way. And I don't believe that Google is truly super-arms military solution. I do believe that Google has good intentions. But these motives continue to scare me. Eventually, that we think of Google is pure chance, based on facts easily available, but this speculation on Google is apparently to-day the pastime of several people.

It is not a wonder: after all, Google is just the company more intrigante which has honoured our economy for 10 years. In my opinion that Google has good intentions, but as good as they may be, caused by their success scares me. The creators of Google have to be platonists If Plato always lived, it would probably work with Google. Google is looking for ideal, even if that one is finally inaccessible. With the difference of the most the major organizations which make the titles of the financial magazines, Google isn't mainly justified by the money.

The enthusiasm of Google is the Intellectual, overcoming the problems of organized information. Google known as: The mission of Google will be to organize world information and to make it widely available and of good use. And it's what it does. The corporation quantified to several million dollars, unquestionably one of most effective in the world, has the target easy to organize world data.

Google will be the vastest system of list of world. Obviously, that does not want to say that Google does not have any enthusiasm for your money - and it's truly some. The device with under that's Google could be the containing hydrocarbon certainly one of its idealistic aspirations. Google can concern more difficulties, to create more ressouces and it defines eventually more because of this money. Nevertheless the money never prevents the act gathering, organizing and from making data available, with contrario of Microsoft.

Even though the goal of Microsoft is to help the people and the companies to reach their full capabilities, this help is not free. The essential commodities of Microsoft are made to be sold. It is the original style of the financial practices. In contrast to this standard type of business, that of Google is very idealistic. That may be as a result of fact that Google wasn't created to make-money, but rather in a reaction to the process that Sergey Brin and Larry Page create by creating a successful search engine.

To include/understand the newest developments of Google Schmidt: We work hard to keep this picture to be uncontrollable. But makes some, our organization is extremely measured. Be taught extra resources on our affiliated article by browsing to https://www.itweb.es/index.php?action=profile;u=282092. And that belonged to your secrecy. Page: Generally, we don't speak about our method since it is ideal. I choose to let think that we are confused instead of to produce known with our rivals what we will do. -- Extract of a meeting of That Time Period Magazine Well, let be if you ask me the first to ever congratulate the Servant kids on Google. Your target to seem uncontrollable was achieved.

During these last years, Google launched several products which made kind the top of the analysts contrary to the walls. Some launchings met either a thin approval, or created a total confusion (it is perhaps not what Google is cautious to do?). These products also seem to be rather independent: products which make it possible to people to organize their planning (Google Calendar), or to evaluate the research in their Web sites (Google Analytics).

The concept which prevails is that Google starts the products like method of improving the conscience of mark, to create other programs using their AdWords pro-gram, and sometimes even for just releasing some thing to-see if it obtains a broad approval (like Google SiteMaps). Nevertheless, if we have a look at these products within the light of their mission (to assemble and organize world information), each product belongs to-the overall mission of Google. Eventually, Google collects well data and in very great part.

Out of this time just, Google may start its class. Now Google seeks the data of the users, the latter demand even for that. The majority of the new services of Google store the data of the people. If you use this program of tchat of Google, you can keep your entire discussions in a history with chance for research. Google Finance stores information on your favorite stocks, on that you launch a monitoring.

GMail allows you to store until 3GB messages, you motivation ergo automatically not to take them off (it's probably what Google wants?). Google Base was presented under the mysterious reason that it was where to issue and shop your contents, any contents. Google Reader stores your histories of flow RSS, and now Google Calendar is incorporated into GMail and other services to supply you with the possibility of saving still more information because of Google.

Google doesn't launch new products to improve the mind of mark; it starts these new products to collect more information and to learn how all of this information functions together. These details can be related to a registered individual, and can be removed utilizing the different products from Google (such integration of Google Calendar in GMail). Around which place I really do want that Google knows? If we really live in the time of information, then Google could become the strongest entity of the world.

Even though I didn't see any official study on the subject, I don't think that whoever would be amazed by knowing that there is more the data saved at Google than at any other organization or multi-national in most the history. Despite all of this information, Google attempts always more. The question that we ought to be asked is only knowledge of which amount of data holds only one company. Let us be us opposed if Google Wallet became an individual center of finance where you are able to handle your balances in the budget, pay your accounts online, and receive personalized financial reports/ratios (obviously all accessible and integral in Google Finance).

Is this it towards what we move with Google while understanding slightly too much about us? Each new solution of Google is used to him to gather more information. Although this goal to collect, manage and provide this information for the whole world, is actually a relatively innocent goal, do not should not put to us on pause one moment: do we want that Google achieves this vision?.